// service · Assessments
Plant Detailed OT Risk Assessment
Plant-floor risk modeled the way operators experience it — loss-of-view and loss-of-control scenarios, per zone, with a remediation roadmap the CFO will fund.
Most plant risk assessments stop at a CVSS list. The report names a hundred vulnerabilities, ranks them by score, and leaves operations no closer to a decision. Loss-of-view and loss-of-control get a paragraph. The remediation roadmap reads like a software backlog the CFO will not fund.
This assessment models risk the way the plant experiences it. We run the IEC 62443-3-2 detailed method zone by zone, build the scenarios that actually threaten production — loss of view, loss of control, safety consequence — and score each by likelihood and impact on the operation, not by CVSS alone.
The deliverable is a defensible, costed remediation roadmap sequenced for your budget cycle, with every finding mapped to a task in Resilion so the work has somewhere to go.
Frequently asked questions
- What does a detailed OT risk assessment cover?
- The full IEC 62443-3-2 detailed method: each zone and conduit assessed against realistic threat scenarios, with loss-of-view and loss-of-control consequences modeled, likelihood and impact scored, and countermeasures mapped to a costed roadmap.
- Why not just use CVSS scores?
- CVSS ranks vulnerabilities in the abstract. A PLC with a CVSS-9 that cannot be reached from the boundary may matter less than a CVSS-5 on a controller that runs a safety-critical line. We rank by production impact so remediation money goes where it changes risk.
- Will the output survive a CapEx review?
- Yes — that is the point. Findings are tied to business consequence and a sequenced, costed roadmap, so finance can fund the plan instead of a list of vulnerabilities.
See Resilion on your fleet
Book a 30-minute demo. We will show how Resilion turns your existing assessments into a program you can run and prove.